Phenotype normalization
Phenotype normalization is a critical preprocessing step in GWAS to ensure valid statistical inference, numerical stability, and comparability across cohorts.
Raw measures
Definition
The phenotype is analyzed in its original measurement scale:
When appropriate - Binary traits (case–control) - Approximately normally distributed quantitative traits
Pros - Preserves biological units and interpretability
Cons - Sensitive to skewness and outliers
Residual (covariate and medication adjusted)
Definition
The phenotype is adjusted for covariates and medication effects using regression:
where
- \(\mathbf{C}_i\): age, sex, PCs, batch, center
- \(\mathbf{M}_i\): medication indicators, dosage, or drug class
Medication adjustment strategies - Indicator-based covariate (most common) - Dosage or drug-class covariates - Pre-correction (phenotype shifting, e.g. +10 mmHg for BP) - Exclusion of medicated individuals (not recommended)
Pros - Removes systematic non-genetic effects - Improves power and reduces bias
Cons - Residuals may still be non-normal
Z score
Definition
Standardization to zero mean and unit variance:
Pros - Comparable effect sizes across cohorts - Stable regression behavior
Cons - Does not correct skewness - Sensitive to outliers
Rank-based inverse normal transformation (INT)
Definition
Transforms phenotype ranks to a standard normal distribution:
where
- \(r_i\): rank of individual \(i\)
- \(c = 3/8\) (Blom's transformation, commonly used; \(c = 0.5\) is also used in Rankit transformation)
Pros - Enforces normality - Robust to outliers - Controls type-I error
Cons - Effect sizes lose original scale - Alters genetic architecture
Recommended workflows
- Raw → GWAS (binary traits)
- Residual → Z (well-behaved quantitative traits)
- Residual → INT (highly skewed traits)
- Medication correction → Residual → Z / INT (clinical traits)
References
- Beasley, T. M., Erickson, S., & Allison, D. B. (2009). Rank-based inverse normal transformations are increasingly used, but are they merited? Behavior Genetics, 39(5), 580-595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-009-9281-0 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19526352/