Phenotype normalization
Phenotype normalization is a critical preprocessing step in GWAS to ensure valid statistical inference, numerical stability, and comparability across cohorts.
On this page
Raw measures
Definition
The phenotype is analyzed in its original measurement scale:
When appropriate - Binary traits (case–control) - Approximately normally distributed quantitative traits
Pros - Preserves biological units and interpretability
Cons - Sensitive to skewness and outliers
Residual (covariate and medication adjusted)
Definition
The phenotype is adjusted for covariates and medication effects using regression:
where
- \(\mathbf{C}_i\): age, sex, PCs, batch, center
- \(\mathbf{M}_i\): medication indicators, dosage, or drug class
Medication adjustment strategies - Indicator-based covariate (most common) - Dosage or drug-class covariates - Pre-correction (phenotype shifting, e.g. +10 mmHg for BP) - Exclusion of medicated individuals (not recommended)
Pros - Removes systematic non-genetic effects - Improves power and reduces bias
Cons - Residuals may still be non-normal
Z score
Definition
Standardization to zero mean and unit variance:
Pros - Comparable effect sizes across cohorts - Stable regression behavior
Cons - Does not correct skewness - Sensitive to outliers
Rank-based inverse normal transformation (INT)
Definition
Transforms phenotype ranks to a standard normal distribution:
where
- \(r_i\): rank of individual \(i\)
- \(c = 3/8\) (Blom's transformation, commonly used; \(c = 0.5\) is also used in Rankit transformation)
Pros - Enforces normality - Robust to outliers - Controls type-I error
Cons - Effect sizes lose original scale - Alters genetic architecture
Recommended workflows
- Raw → GWAS (binary traits)
- Residual → Z (well-behaved quantitative traits)
- Residual → INT (highly skewed traits)
- Medication correction → Residual → Z / INT (clinical traits)
References
- Beasley, T. M., Erickson, S., & Allison, D. B. (2009). Rank-based inverse normal transformations are increasingly used, but are they merited? Behavior Genetics, 39(5), 580-595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-009-9281-0 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19526352/